Lets imagine a man taking a woman to the dance floor, and
as they proceed, he tells her at every step and move what she should do, where
to go, how he thinks she should move there, even though she is already skilled
in the dance steps. This will quickly become a miserable experience for the
woman, who would not be questioned for kicking this man in the groin for such
actions. A woman would be understandably quite angry with this type of
behavior, and at the time she storms off, this man would think, in a frustrated
manner, “ But she said she wanted me to lead!”
Now consider the same man taking a woman onto the dance floor, leading her through the dance. He leads her as far as the structure of the dance with the music is concerned; he has his steps, and she has hers that juxtaposes with his. It is a balanced equation, a symmetry that flows naturally, and no words need be spoken to have it be so. A man, in this specific relationship, provides the blank canvas for the woman to fill with colors and definition. A man allows the space for the woman to fill with her creativity, style, manner and grace. It is lovely and sexy, and all of it done as a partnership.
Now consider the same man taking a woman onto the dance floor, leading her through the dance. He leads her as far as the structure of the dance with the music is concerned; he has his steps, and she has hers that juxtaposes with his. It is a balanced equation, a symmetry that flows naturally, and no words need be spoken to have it be so. A man, in this specific relationship, provides the blank canvas for the woman to fill with colors and definition. A man allows the space for the woman to fill with her creativity, style, manner and grace. It is lovely and sexy, and all of it done as a partnership.
But there's a very important distinction to still make......
No comments:
Post a Comment